We may be a few months out from the new year, but it's safe to say that the demise of Don't Ask, Don't Tell will be marked as a highlight of 2011. The end of that discriminatory statute and its demeaning implications to the men and women who serve our country is something to be celebrated. But even though DADT is gone, the legacy of unfair treatment of gay and lesbian veterans continues.
One of those legacies is the Defense Department's separation pay policy for discharged service members. If you serve six years in the military and are then discharged involuntarily, Congress says you're entitled to separation pay to help ease your transition to civilian life. But the DOD has an internal policy — not required by any statute — of cutting that separation pay in half if you're discharged, even honorably, for "homosexuality."
Let's be clear: Many of those who were discharged under DADT were distinguished soldiers, airmen or cadets and had an unblemished record. They were service members in good standing, and there was nothing dishonorable about their discharge. Yet they are denied the same separation pay as other honorably discharged service members merely because they're gay or lesbian.
That's what happened to our lead client in our class action lawsuit challenging this needless policy. Richard Collins was a decorated Air Force Staff Sergeant who served nine years before being kicked out under DADT. He was seen kissing his civilian boyfriend, in a car at a stoplight, when he was off duty, out of uniform, and 10 miles off base. After being discharged under DADT, Staff Sgt. Collins discovered that his separation pay was cut in half.
We filed this lawsuit on behalf of Collins and 142 other service members about a year ago. We expected at the time that, once Congress passed the statute authorizing repeal of DADT, the government would quickly settle the case and give these honorably discharged service members the separation pay they are entitled to. Instead, the government has inexplicably dragged its feet every step of the way.
In May, the government asked the court to dismiss the case, without even defending the constitutionality of the policy. Instead the government argued that the courts could not provide any relief to service members whose separation pay was cut in half while DADT was still in effect. It didn't make sense to us, and apparently, it didn't make any sense to the court. Today, Judge Christine O.C. Miller of the U.S. Court of Federal Claims denied the government's request and will allow these veterans to be heard.
The court's decision means that these 142 service members will finally have their day in court. The government will have to explain to them and to the rest of the public how cutting their pay in half served important governmental interests. The government will have to make that explanation, even though the Pentagon has already issued a detailed report making clear that discrimination against gay and lesbian service members is entirely unnecessary and doesn't serve the interests of the military. Good luck with that.
The government's conduct is all the more baffling because in other contexts, the Justice Department has worked hard to defend LGBT people from this sort of pointless discrimination. Most dramatically, the Justice Department issued a thorough legal opinion explaining why discrimination based on sexual orientation must be treated as constitutionally suspect and has refused to defend the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act in federal court. But apparently, the relevant decisionmakers at the Pentagon haven't gotten the memo, and continue to defend this outdated and irrational policy.
This case is about more than money. It's about basic fairness. When you make a mistake, the right thing to do is to apologize and try to fix the problem. The government can't undo all the harm that DADT inflicted on Mr. Collins and other honorably discharged veterans. But it can at least take the small step of giving these veterans the separation pay that was gratuitously taken away from them. In Richard Collins' own words: "We gave all in serving this nation. The Pentagon should not give us half in return."
- Joshua  Block, ACLU LGBT Project

Date

Monday, October 24, 2011 - 10:57am

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

LGBTQ+ Rights

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar

Tania Chozet, Policy Advocate


We recently reached the two-year anniversary of the Obama administration’s announcement that it would reform our country’s immigration detention system, moving from our current penal-based system of detention to a more humane system that is tailored to individuals who have only violated civil codes of immigration law. Tonight, PBS’s Frontline will debut “Lost in Detention,” an investigative documentary that will examine the progress of these reform efforts and where they still fall short.
Immigration advocacy groups have sized up the reform efforts thus far in comprehensive reports and blogs. They show that, although there has been some progress at the policy level, the detention conditions on the ground have not improved.  Also, recent FOIA requests by the ACLU and the Houston Chronicle confirm that, internally, ICE is aware of the continued, severe problems in its detention system, despite publicly touting its reforms.
 
In all of this analysis of how far the Obama administration’s efforts have or haven’t come, immigration advocates should recognize that there have been some productive results in our collaborative efforts.
 
For example, two years ago, the Obama administration began ramping up Secure Communities, an immigration enforcement program that is ostensibly intended to identify serious criminals who are in the country illegally. In response, advocates went to work on exposing the program’s many problems , not the least of which is that the program compromises community policing models and undermines the public’s trust in local police by discouraging witnesses and victims from reporting crimes for fear that they will be deported. In addition, advocates noted that, despite the stated mission of the program, half of the people deported under Secure Communities have no criminal background. Immigrant advocates collaborated to develop successful campaigns urging states to withdraw from Secure Communities, ultimately convincing governors, mayors and chiefs of police to denounce the program publicly.
 
These efforts exposed the program’s many shortcomings in the public and the media. Eventually, the Obama administration took notice.
 
In “Lost in Detention,” Cecilia Muñoz, a top Obama official, acknowledges that the administration has heard the calls for reform, and has reacted to them. Although the administration has not suspended Secure Communities, there is some hope in that the administration announced changes to the program, including the use of prosecutorial discretion to reduce the deportation of immigrants without criminal histories. The administration also recently announced that it would review 300,000 cases currently in deportation proceedings. 
 
These are not the best solutions, but they do represent progress.
 
Similarly, in the area of detention reform, advocates have had to expend herculean efforts and, while improvements have been far from overwhelming, there have been some wins. In 2009, a Freedom of Information Act request filed by the ACLU triggered a review of the system. The Obama administration took an honest look at its immigration detention system in a report it issued in October 2009. From that report followed announcements by the Department of Homeland Security about plans to reform the immigration detention system to one that is more suited for civil detention.  Two years later, the system is still a far cry from one that is suited to civil detention. According to a recent report by Human Rights First, even if all of the planned reforms were implemented, only 14 percent of the immigrants detained would benefit. Nonetheless, that same report acknowledges some improvements.
 
Tonight, as we watch “Lost in Detention,” it will be easier to count the ways in which the system has not changed. I’m probably not giving out any spoilers in saying that the show reveals that the many of the reforms are “smoke and mirrors” rather than real change.  It might be tempting to feel as if our efforts to win real immigration detention reform were in vain. Yet, change at a trickle is still progress, and the administration, though hard of hearing, is listening. Immigration advocates should watch “Lost in Detention” with this in mind. As Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, “[c]hange does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle. And so we must straighten our backs and work for our freedom.”

Date

Tuesday, October 18, 2011 - 12:31pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Corrections Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar
The firm, founded in 1974, is a litigation firm with practice areas as varied as the interests of its members. Its lawyers practice in both federal and state trial and appellate courts, from the municipal courts to the Supreme Court of the United States, and handle a broad spectrum of civil and criminal cases. It was founded by lawyers who were and still are good friends and professional colleagues with a shared commitment to the use of the judicial system for its intended purpose of rendering true justice. Five of the firm’s six partners have been selected by their professional peers to be included in the respected publication, Best Lawyers in America. In the years since its founding, the firm has grown slowly by the addition of exceptional lawyers who share the same vision and commitment.
http://www.fbdlaw.com/index.html

Date

Thursday, October 13, 2011 - 3:44pm

Featured image

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of New Mexico RSS