The plaintiffs in this case are all community advocates against police use of excessive force. They regularly attend POC meetings to monitor the body’s investigations of alleged incidents of abuse. A New Mexico jury recently ordered the City of Albuquerque to pay 10.7 million dollars in damages to the family of plaintiff Kenneth Ellis after an Albuquerque police officer wrongfully killed his son, Kenneth Ellis III.
“I have the right and obligation to speak out and do everything in my power to ensure that no other father has to go through what I have,” said plaintiff Kenneth Ellis. “The Police Oversight Commission may not like what I have to say, but the First Amendment right to free speech exists for the sole purpose of protecting speech that the Government doesn’t like.”
The complaint alleges that before the public comment section of the December 13 meeting, Commissioner Martinez stated that all public comments would be limited to one specific agenda item, excluding the concerns the plaintiffs held regarding Martinez’s membership in the Fraternal Order of Police Auxiliary—a membership the plaintiffs considered to constitute a conflict of interest due to that organization’s opposition to external police oversight bodies. By limiting the discussion, a deviation from standard commission practice, plaintiffs allege that the commission attempted to silence their criticism. When another attendee, Andrés Valdez, attempted to speak on Commissioner Martinez’s perceived conflict during his allotted time for public comments, Commissioner Richard Shine interrupted his statement and ultimately directed police officers to forcibly remove him from the room. The commission permitted no further discussion of Commissioner Martinez’s perceived conflict of interest during the public comments section of the meeting.
“In our country, every person has the right to engage in political speech and voice their opinion—even if the Government doesn’t like what’s being said, even if the Government doesn't want to hear it,” said ACLU-NM Executive Director Peter Simonson. “Nowhere is this right more important than when speaking out against perceived corruption or misuse of government power. The POC cannot attempt to silence criticism of public officials during the designated public comments period.”
The suit seeks punitive and compensatory damages against the POC for violating the plaintiff’s First Amendment right to free speech
Read a copy of the complaint here
ACLU-NM Staff Attorney Alexandra Freedman Smith and ACLU-NM cooperating attorney Josh Ewing of Ewing & Ewing PC represent the plaintiffs in this case.
###
Date
Tuesday, April 2, 2013 - 12:34pmFeatured image
Show featured image
Hide banner image
Tweet Text
Related issues
Show related content
Menu parent dynamic listing
Style
Standard with sidebar
