ALBUQUERQUE, NM – Today, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico sent letters to county jails throughout the State of New Mexico, discouraging them from routinely strip searching arrestees without reasonable suspicion that they possess contraband. Despite  a recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that broadened strip search authority under the federal Constitution, the ACLU asserts that the New Mexico State Constitution would altogether prohibit routine, suspicionless strip searches.
 
“Our State Constitution holds our law enforcement officials to higher standards,” said ACLU of New Mexico Executive Director Peter Simonson. “In New Mexico, we know that subjecting people to routine strip searches without reasonable suspicion is wrong. It is humiliating, degrading and dehumanizing.”
 
New Mexico courts have consistently interpreted Article II, Section 10 of the New Mexico State Constitution (our state constitutional equivalent to the Fourth Amendment) to guarantee a ‘broad right’ to be ‘free from unwarranted governmental intrusion.’ Legal analysis of the state constitution has led ACLU of New Mexico attorneys to conclude that New Mexico courts would likely find suspicionless strip searches of people arrested for minor offenses unreasonable.
 
The case that prompted the Supreme Court ruling involved a man named Albert Florence, who was arrested in 2005 due to a police computer error that showed he failed to pay a fine he had already taken care of. Though innocent, Florence was held for six days and strip searched twice, made to squat naked and cough as jail officials examined his body. Throughout the country, an estimated 700,000 individuals are sent to jail for relatively minor infractions every year. Often people are found to be innocent of charges or the court drops the charges against them.
 
“This is something that could happen to anybody,” said ACLU of New Mexico Managing Attorney Laura Schauer Ives. “For something as small as forgetting to pay a traffic fine, you could find yourself standing naked before a government employee. We want to make sure that jail officials understand that this is unacceptable in New Mexico.”
 
In its letter, the ACLU of New Mexico declares its commitment to ensuring that the Supreme Court’s recent ruling does not give rise to gratuitous use of strip searches and violations under the New Mexico constitution in New Mexico’s jails.


Read the letter here: Letter to NM Jails
 

###

Date

Tuesday, May 8, 2012 - 8:45am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Police Practices Corrections Reform

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar
The ACLU of New Mexico Regional Center for Border Rights and the Southern Border Communities Coalition has worked to shed light on Border Patrol brutality and rights abuses—including the eight men and boys agents have shot and killed over the past two years. On April 20, we shocked the nation with the exposé “Crossing the Line,” which aired on the PBS show Need to  Know.
mytubethumb play
%3Cobject%20width%3D%22512%22%20height%3D%22328%22%20classid%3D%22clsid%3Ad27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000%22%20codebase%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fdownload.macromedia.com%2Fpub%2Fshockwave%2Fcabs%2Fflash%2Fswflash.cab%23version%3D6%2C0%2C40%2C0%22%20allow%3D%22autoplay%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22flashvars%22%20value%3D%22video%3D2225180660%26amp%3Bplayer%3Dviral%26amp%3Bend%3D0%26amp%3Blr_admap%3Din%3Awarnings%3A0%3Bin%3Apbs%3A0%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22allowFullScreen%22%20value%3D%22true%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22allowscriptaccess%22%20value%3D%22always%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22wmode%22%20value%3D%22transparent%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22src%22%20value%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww-tc.pbs.org%2Fs3%2Fpbs.videoportal-prod.cdn%2Fmedia%2Fswf%2FPBSPlayer.swf%22%3E%3Cparam%20name%3D%22allowfullscreen%22%20value%3D%22true%22%3E%3Cembed%20width%3D%22512%22%20height%3D%22328%22%20type%3D%22application%2Fx-shockwave-flash%22%20src%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww-tc.pbs.org%2Fs3%2Fpbs.videoportal-prod.cdn%2Fmedia%2Fswf%2FPBSPlayer.swf%22%20flashvars%3D%22video%3D2225180660%26amp%3Bplayer%3Dviral%26amp%3Bend%3D0%26amp%3Blr_admap%3Din%3Awarnings%3A0%3Bin%3Apbs%3A0%22%20allowfullscreen%3D%22true%22%20allowscriptaccess%3D%22always%22%20wmode%3D%22transparent%22%3E%3C%2Fembed%3E%3C%2Fobject%3E
Privacy statement. This embed will serve content from pbs.org.

Watch Crossing the line at the border on PBS. See more from Need To Know. WARNING: Watching this video will take you to an outside website with a privacy policy that differs from ACLU of New Mexico. A copy of PBS's privacy policy can be read here.

 

TAKE ACTION

SIGN THE PETITION: Demand Respect for Life from the U.S. Border Patrol.
 
 
 
 
 

Date

Monday, April 23, 2012 - 12:35pm

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Police Practices

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar

ALBUQUERQUE, NM – The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Mexico has filed a lawsuit against the New Mexico Children's Psychiatric Hospital (NMCPH) for violating LeGina and Todd Thomases right to direct the care and upbringing of their 12-year-old daughter. The Thomases allege that the hospital mistakenly diagnosed their daughter as severely mentally ill, and threatened to have the state take custody of her if they did not approve administration of strong psychotropic drugs intended for adults.
 
“While psychiatrists can provide valuable insight, the decision of whether a young child is exposed to potentially dangerous psychotropic drugs should be the parents’,” says ACLU-NM Managing Attorney Laura Schauer Ives.   “In this case, doctors attempted to usurp the Thomases’ right to make major medical decisions for their daughter because the parents disagreed that medication should be the first line of treatment. Insisting that doctors exhaust other treatment options before administering powerful psychotropic drugs does not make parents incompetent. It means they care about their child and want what’s best for her.”
 
In April 2010, LeGina and Todd Thomas’s daughter was referred to NMCPH in connection with a police investigation into the possibility that an older boy had inappropriate sexual contact with her. The doctors diagnosed her with schizophrenia, borderline personality disorder and severe depression. They insisted that she receive strong psychotropic medications, some of which carry the FDA’s “black box” label warning that they may increase risk of suicide.
 
The Thomases’ daughter had no previous history of mental illness. Both the police and the Thomases were skeptical of the daughter’s claims that she was suicidal and experiencing hallucinations, believing that she was trying to distract them from pressing charges against the boy she may have had sex with. The Thomases declined the medications for their daughter, insisting that doctors exhaust less extreme treatment options, including counseling, before administering serious drugs.
 
In response, NMCPH placed an emergency medical hold on the Thomases’ daughter, asserting that the parents were not competent to make medical decisions on her behalf. Two days later, an NMCPH nurse prohibited Mrs. Thomson from talking with her daughter after she had been attacked by another psychiatric patient and suffered a minor head wound. Soon thereafter, NMCPH filed to have the daughter involuntarily committed to their care.
 
However, on May 5, 2010, the NMCPH received notice from the Thomases’ insurance carrier that the daughter’s stay would no longer be covered. NMCPH immediately dropped all efforts to commit her involuntarily and instructed the Thomases to retrieve their daughter from the hospital before her insurance coverage ended.
 
 
The daughter subsequently confessed to her parents that she had faked her symptoms of mental illness and apologized. In the two intervening years, she has exhibited no further behavioral problems and has continued to excel in school.
 
“No other family should have to endure the nightmare we did,” says LeGina Thomas. “We knew our daughter had just told a lie that snowballed out of control, but no one would listen to us. Instead they tried to take her away from us and drug her up.”
 
The plaintiffs are suing NMCPH for punitive and compensatory damages for First Amendment retaliation, and violating the Thomases right to familial association, direct care and upbringing of a child.
 
The legal complaint was filed in U.S. District Court by ACLU-NM Managing Attorney Laura Schauer Ives and Co-Legal Directors Matthew Garcia and Maureen Sanders.
 
A full copy of the legal complaint can be found here: Thomas v. NMCPH
CONTACT: Micah McCoy, (505) 266-5915 x1003 or [email protected]

###

Date

Friday, April 20, 2012 - 9:30am

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Free Speech

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

Style

Standard with sidebar

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of New Mexico RSS