Noah Schramm, Border Strategist, ACLU of Arizona

Seeking lives of safety and opportunity, people coming to the United States as migrants and asylum-seekers may carry only their most essential and beloved possessions. When they arrive in the U.S. and are taken into Border Patrol custody, many migrants endure the devastating loss of their property: Border Patrol agents routinely confiscate, trash, or force them to throw away their precious belongings.

In a new report published in partnership with organizations working on the southern border, From Hope to Heartbreak, we document routine cases of this abusive treatment focusing on confiscation of medication and medical devices, legal and identity documents, religious items, and items of financial, practical, or sentimental value.

The report relies heavily on hundreds of intakes conducted by the Kino Border Initiative (KBI), which runs a migrant aid center along Mexico’s border with Arizona, and ProtectAZ Health, which offers free medical screenings and care to migrants in Phoenix.

Medications and Medical Devices

A pile of various medical materials.

Border Patrol and its parent agency, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), have routinely confiscated life-saving medications and medical devices from adults and children who have illnesses such as seizure disorders, high blood pressure, diabetes, asthma, and genetic conditions.

CBP agents took a 5-year-old girl’s epilepsy medications away from her mother. When the little girl, whom we are calling Rosa, experienced convulsions, she was taken to the hospital. When she was discharged from the hospital and returned to CBP custody with new medications and special dietary supplements, CBP agents confiscated those. Not until the family was released to a shelter in Las Cruces, New Mexico, did Rosa receive the medical care she needed.

Depriving people of their necessary medication obviously risks their health and safety. It also adds stress to local hospital systems, as people need to visit the emergency room or be hospitalized because their health deteriorates from missing their medication.

ProtectAZ received a 13-year-old boy, whom we are calling Leonel, at their shelter. Leonel has a genetic condition in which he lacks a necessary amino acid that prevents the build up of ammonia in his body. The condition can have serious consequences if untreated, including seizures, coma and death. Leonel needed to take daily supplements, but they were confiscated by Border Patrol in Casa Grande, Arizona. At the ProtectAZ shelter, Leonel’s health deteriorated, and he had to be admitted to the hospital for a week to stabilize his condition.

In a separate occurrence, a 7-year-old boy with moderate-persistent asthma was detained for two days. His inhaler was taken away, and he wasn’t given a replacement. After being released, he developed respiratory symptoms, and his condition worsened quickly. His family took him to the emergency department, and he was transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit.

Legal and Identity Documents

A honduran passport.

Confiscating or destroying legal and identity documents, such as birth certificates, passports, medical records, and documents to substantiate asylum claims, has been a hallmark of Border Patrol’s operations.

One man told KBI that Border Patrol agents tore his birth certificate up in front of him. He managed to save his Mexican identity card because he had hidden it in his shoe. Advocates in the Rio Grande Valley Sector in Texas report finding discarded documents that could be important in substantiating asylum claims, such as police reports and medical records. Volunteers with the Borderlands Collective in San Diego say document confiscation is especially concerning for parents of minor children, who may not be able to prove that they are family without their children’s birth records.

“Passports are very important here,” one person had shared. “To open an account, to identify yourself, and I don’t have that document. I don’t have the children’s birth records because they took them from me. That makes me feel terrible.”

Migrants who are deported, expelled or returned to Mexico cannot withdraw or receive money without identity documents. Confiscated or destroyed documents pose a significant barrier to asylum-seekers’ ability to substantiate their claims. The Children’s Legal Center sued Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) on behalf of 68 asylum-seekers whose documents the agency had confiscated. The lawsuit argues the confiscation violates the plaintiffs’ due process rights to seek work authorization and to support their asylum cases.

Religious Items

A pile of religious items, including a small Buddha statue and an image of the Virgin Mary.

Over the summer of 2022, there was a spike in reports of Border Patrol taking away Sikh asylum-seekers’ turbans. Forcing a Sikh person to remove their turban is a serious violation of their faith. “They told me to take off my turban. I know a little English, and I said, ‘It’s my religion.’ But they insisted.” The man pleaded with the officers, but they forced him to remove his turban and toss it in a pile of trash. He asked if he could at least keep his turban for when he was released from custody, but they told him no.

While Border Patrol has since taken positive steps forward on how it handles turbans and other Sikh articles of faith, the agency’s religious freedom violations aren’t limited to people of the Sikh faith. A person told KBI that Border Patrol agents took his Bible, which he told them had significant spiritual meaning to him, and trashed it in front of him. Border Patrol agents in Yuma told several Muslim migrants they had to throw away their prayer mats. One of the men said his prayer mat had been in his family for more than 100 years.

Migrants’ religious freedom is protected both by the First Amendment and the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which provides additional protection for the free exercise of religion. Some asylum-seekers are fleeing religious persecution in their home countries, and the experience of CBP violating their religious faith can be a retraumatizing experience. CBP has been made aware of their violations for years, suggesting a failure of CBP policy and practice to fully respect the religious freedom rights of migrants and asylum-seekers.

Items of Practical, Financial, or Sentimental Value

A collection of documents, money, and a damaged smartphone.

Migrants have regularly reported Border Patrol agents confiscate their money and cellphones. These items are of clear value and represent a devastating loss: impoverishment and loss of contact with loved ones. Several migrants told KBI they lost the equivalent of hundreds of dollars to Border Patrol. One man described seeing a Border Patrol agent take 3,000 pesos from another man and rip it up in his face. Other migrants described the loss of family photos on their confiscated cellphones.

Confiscation of clothing appears to be widespread in Border Patrol custody, leaving migrants with only a single layer of clothing. “The official asked me how many shirts I had, and I responded that I had two shirts plus a sweater. The official started laughing and told me I had to take everything off but one shirt,” one person recounted.

Volunteers and shelters supporting migrants are critical of this practice, especially during the winter and if migrants are traveling north. One shelter in Las Cruces, New Mexico, said it spent $100,000 every month to provide clothes to migrants. Once the Border Patrol sectors in New Mexico reduced their confiscation of people’s clothes, the shelter reported reducing costs for clothing people by half.

Finally, migrants report having their cherished belongings confiscated or trashed – children’s toys, heirloom jewelry, and even a loved one’s ashes. One man said Border Patrol agents forced him to throw away his father’s ashes – his father had died while journeying to the U.S. from Nicaragua.

The Systematic Confiscation of Migrants' Belongings at the U.S. Southern Border, Despite the Vast Resources Available to Border Patrol, is Indefensible

CBP’s practice of property confiscation and destruction isn’t only cruel, unnecessary, and, in some cases, life-threatening, in many cases, it likely violates federal law and policy. We outline achievable policy changes that CBP can adopt to protect the dignity, safety, and rights of people arriving in the U.S.

Border Patrol must ensure migrants in its custody and those released from custody have continuous access to their medications and medical devices. Migrants should be allowed to keep as many of their personal belongings as possible in custody and after they are released. CBP must change its policies to comply with federal safeguards of religious freedom in its treatment of people’s religious garb and religious items.

The bottom line is that CBP can and must do better to live up to our nation’s values and commitments to people seeking safety within our borders. People seeking refuge in the U.S. deserve to be welcomed with dignity.

Date

Monday, February 26, 2024 - 1:45pm

Featured image

A man and woman with baggage at the border.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Override default banner image

A man and woman with baggage at the border.

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU: Share image

Related issues

Border Rights

Show related content

Imported from National NID

146752

Menu parent dynamic listing

17

Imported from National VID

147030

Imported from National Link

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Centered single-column (no sidebar)

Teaser subhead

A new report details Border Patrol’s cruel and unnecessary confiscation and destruction of migrants’ belongings, including medicines, legal documents, and religious objects.

Show list numbers

Leah Watson, Senior Staff Attorney, ACLU's Racial Justice Program

First, Donald Trump and right-wing extremists attacked government trainings on racism and sexism. Then the far right tried to censor classroom instruction on racism and sexism. Next, they banned books about BIPOC and LGBTQ lives. Today, the extreme right’s latest attack is aimed at dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs.

In 2023, the far right introduced at least 65 bills to limit DEI in higher education in 25 states and the U.S. Congress. Eight bills became law. If this assault on our constitutional rights feels familiar, that’s because it is. It was last seen in 2020 when Trump-aligned politicians fought to pass unconstitutional laws aimed at censoring student and faculty speech about race, racism, sex and sexism. The ACLU challenged these laws in three states, but today, anti-DEI efforts are the new frontier in the fight to end the erasure of marginalized communities.

DEI programs recruit and retain BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and other underrepresented faculty and students to repair decades of discriminatory policies and practices that excluded them from higher education. The far right, however, claims that DEI programs universally promote undeserving people who only advance because they check a box. Anti-DEI activists like Christopher Rufo consistently frame their attack as a strike against “identity politics,” and have weaponized the term “DEI” to reference any ideas and policies they disagree with, especially those that address systemic racism or sexism.

This attack on DEI is part of a larger backlash against racial justice efforts that ignited after the 2020 killings of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery and Breonna Taylor. At the time, workplaces, schools, and other institutions announced plans to expand DEI efforts and to incorporate anti-racism principles in their communities. In response, far-right activists, led by Rufo and supported by right-wing think tanks such as The Manhattan Institute, The Claremont Institute, and The Heritage Foundation, went on the offensive.

Leveraging Fox News and other mainstream media outlets, Rufo and his supporters sought to manufacture hysteria around the inclusion of critical race theory in schools and workplaces. After a 2020 appearance on Fox News where Rufo misrepresented the nature of federal trainings on oppression, white privilege, and intersectionality as indoctrination of critical race theory in our public spaces, Rufo convinced former President Trump to end federal DEI training. Rufo’s goal was to limit discourse, instruction, and research that refuted the false assertion that racism is not real in America – and he succeeded. Just three weeks later, Trump issued Executive Order 13950, which banned federal trainings on systemic racism and sexism. This Executive Order served as the template for most of the educational gag orders, or bills introduced to limit instruction on systemic sexism and racism in 40 states, 20 of which are now law.

The ACLU has consistently opposed efforts to censor classroom instruction on racism and sexism, including in Florida where some of the most egregious attacks on DEI, critical race theory and inclusive education have been mounted. Following the far right’s “anti-wokeism” playbook, in April 2022, Florida Governor Ron Desantis signed the Stop W.O.K.E. Act, which seeks to ban training or instruction on systemic racism and sexism in workplaces, K-12 schools, and higher education. The ACLU, the ACLU of Florida and our co-counsel challenged the law, claiming it violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by imposing viewpoint-based restrictions on instructors and students in higher education, and fails to state explicitly and definitely what conduct is punishable. A federal judge has blocked it from being enforced in public universities across the state.

Instead of ceasing to censor free speech, the far right pivoted to target DEI programs. For example, Florida passed Senate Bill 266 in April 2023. This law would expand the Stop W.O.K.E. Act’s prohibition on training and instruction on racism and sexism, seeking to eliminate DEI programs and heavily restrict certain college majors related to DEI. Just last month, the Florida State Board of Education moved forward with regulations to limit the use of public funds for DEI efforts in Florida’s 28 state colleges. The State Board also replaced the Principles of Sociology course, which was previously required, with an American History course to avoid “radical woke ideologies.”

Led by the same far-right leaders, including Rufo and various think-tanks, these anti-DEI efforts utilize the same methods as the attack on critical race theory. They represent yet another attempt to re-whitewash America’s history of racial subjugation, and to reverse efforts to pursue racial justice—or any progress at all. Anti-DEI rhetoric has been used to invalidate immunological research supporting the COVID-19 vaccine, conclusions by economists on mass migration, and even the January 6 insurrection. But these false claims are not what DEI is about. By definition equity means levelling the playing field so qualified people from underrepresented backgrounds have a fair chance to succeed. We cannot let a loud fringe movement convince us otherwise.

In its attacks on DEI, the far right undermines not only racial justice efforts, but also violates our right to free speech and free association. Today, the ACLU is determined to push back on anti-DEI efforts just as we fought efforts to censor instruction on systemic racism and sexism from schools.

Date

Wednesday, February 14, 2024 - 4:30pm

Featured image

A racially-diverse classroom setting.

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Override default banner image

A racially-diverse classroom setting.

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Share Image

ACLU: Share image

Related issues

Racial Justice

Show related content

Imported from National NID

147317

Menu parent dynamic listing

17

Imported from National VID

147872

Imported from National Link

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Centered single-column (no sidebar)

Teaser subhead

The far right wants to get rid of DEI offices, end anti-bias training, and stop public statements of support for diversity. It’s the latest effort to dismantle systems designed to foster racial equity and progress.

Show list numbers

I am one of the many people ensnared in the Albuquerque Police Department’s (APD) DWI Unit’s extortion scandal. I’m sharing my story because what happened to me could happen to you or someone you love, and I never want it to happen to anyone ever again.  

Before I was falsely charged for drinking and driving last summer, I was rebuilding my life and running a janitorial business with my aunt. I had moved back to Albuquerque from Los Angeles a few years before when my career as a professional dancer ended because of a knee injury. My mom and I were getting closer to my aunt and her 16-year-old daughter and living with them to save money for a place of our own.  

But that all ended one Albuquerque evening in late June.  

My cousin and I had been out for an evening of pizza downtown. On the way home, I followed the time-honored Albuquerque tradition of revving my engine in the tunnel under the train tracks. As I pulled out of the tunnel, an unmarked police SUV started flashing its lights at me. I immediately pulled over.  

It was the beginning of a nightmare that I’m still living through. 

The police officer, Joshua Montaño told me I was speeding and that my eyes were red. He asked me if I had been drinking. I said no. He kept complimenting my ‘17 Mustang GT and was friendly like he was trying to be my friend. I thought this was very strange. Now I know that I fit the profile this officer and the others involved in this corruption scheme were looking for and that he might have been trying to get me comfortable so I would accept “help” from him later. 

I couldn’t believe it. I’ve never been in a situation like this.

I’m pretty sure we both knew I wasn’t drunk, but he made me get out of the car, and in front of my teenage cousin and all the traffic going by, he gave me two sobriety tests: an eye test and a counting test. I was nervous and humiliated, but I passed both. He then asked me to do a test that required standing on one leg. I politely told him that I had a knee injury that would make it hard to pass, but I didn’t refuse. I followed his directions, walking back and forth on a line successfully but wobbled when I stood on my bad leg. He said because I had a minor in the car, he had to take me into the station for a breathalyzer test. 

I couldn’t believe it. I’ve never been in a situation like this. I don’t get in trouble. Still, even though I felt like something was off, I was sure once I blew, he would let me go. I was wrong. 

I was concerned about leaving my young cousin alone on the side of the road. He promised to take good care of her (which turns out he did not, and she was picked up by her minor boyfriend). He handcuffed me, put me in the backseat of the police car, and took me to the station. All the way there, he continued to cheerfully chat me up and assured me that if I passed the test, I could go home. 

Once there, officers took my Apple watch and my jewelry, including a gold bracelet that I always wear because it has sentimental value to me. Other officers were looking at me like they were feeling bad for me, but none of them helped me. I wondered if it was because I'm Black or because I'm gay. Now, I think it was because I was another person they could try to extort. I could not believe that the people who were supposed to protect me were abusing their power to hurt me.  

I took the breathalyzer twice and was below the legal limit. I was sure that now I would be able to go home but that’s not what happened. He charged me with a DWI. I felt like the ground was crumbling below my feet. I was terrified and confused. I still had my phone, and I wanted to call 911 for help but realized I was already with the very people I would call. It didn’t feel real. It was too much like a horror movie to be real. With his lapel camera removed, Officer Montaño told me he had an attorney friend who could make this all go away. Alarm bells were going off in my head. This was not right.  

I could not believe that the people who were supposed to protect me were abusing their power to hurt me.  

I called my family, but we are trained to trust and believe the police, and I spent the night in a freezing jail cell.  

When I was released from jail the next morning, they gave me everything back except my bracelet. Officer Montaño left me a voicemail saying the attorney had it. I soon got a call from a paralegal, Rick Mendez, from the law office of Tom Clear, whose number Officer Montaño had given me. It was clear that this was a setup, but I wanted my bracelet back, so I agreed to meet him at the law office.  

My mother was afraid something bad would happen to me and begged me not to go. That’s one of the reasons I decided to record our meeting. 

In the meeting, with my phone, I recorded the paralegal “guaranteeing” to me that this whole thing would disappear from my record if I paid him $8,500. I didn’t take him up on the offer for two reasons: I hadn't been driving drunk, and I didn’t have the money. He gave me my bracelet back in shrink-wrapped plastic and his business card.  

Eventually, I found out the FBI was investigating this organized APD corruption ring, and my case was dismissed. 

During these seven months, my life was taken away from me.

I wish I could say this all happened fast, but it didn’t. My case wasn’t dismissed until a few weeks ago in mid-January. During these seven months, my life was taken away from me. My aunt refused to believe that I was not drunk that evening. It was clear my mom and I could no longer live with her and that I could no longer work with her. To this day, there is a rift between our families. I couldn’t drive anymore, because a judge had ordered an Interlock on my car, which stops you from starting your engine while under the influence, but I couldn’t afford one so working regularly was impossible. Worse still, so I could survive, my mother lent me the money we had worked hard to save to buy a house. We lost our dream of being homeowners and the financial security that comes with it.  

I spent Christmas alone for the first time ever.  

I became so depressed that there were some days I could barely get out of bed. I still cannot drive at night. Every time I see a police officer, I feel my anxiety rise. I do not feel safe. I want to get that back, but I don’t know if I ever will. It is truly shocking that so many APD officers were extorting drivers for years and years. It felt like a movie, but this is my life. 

Through a mutual friend, I found my way to the ACLU. They are going to represent me in a lawsuit against the APD and the City of Albuquerque. I want the police and attorneys who abused their power to be held accountable and for justice to be served. No one should ever have to worry about the police trying to extort money from them and ruin their lives. I hope my story encourages others to come forward and to avoid this ever happening to anyone ever again. 

Date

Wednesday, October 2, 2024 - 9:30am

Featured image

Carlos Sandoval Smith

Show featured image

Hide banner image

Tweet Text

[node:title]

Related issues

Police Practices

Show related content

Menu parent dynamic listing

17

Show PDF in viewer on page

Style

Standard with sidebar

Teaser subhead

No one should ever have to worry about the police trying to extort money from them and ruin their lives.

Show list numbers

Featured video

Pages

Subscribe to ACLU of New Mexico RSS