Marriage Is About Love, Commitment and Family—Not Discrimination

Rev. Dr. Lee Albertson

On Wednesday, September 26th, the Albuquerque Journal published an opinion piece by Doug Mainwaring, a cofounder of the National Capital Tea Party Patriots, supporting the petition effort to repeal the law passed in Maryland that gives gay and lesbian couples the freedom to marry. Mainwaring asserts that gay and lesbian people should accept the ‘separate but equal’ status of civil unions. Although he  is a gay man, I can assure you that Mainwaring’s  views do not represent the majority of same-sex couples here in New Mexico. He also does not represent the views of the majority of Americans who support fairness in marriage. Carving out a separate legal status for a group of people, solely because of who they love, is wrong for Maryland, wrong for New Mexico and wrong for America.


The fact is, most gay and lesbian people treasure marriage for the same reasons any person does. They want to establish and protect a family, make a lifetime commitment in the same way other couples are able to, and to have that special commitment recognized and respected by their government.


During my 39 years as an ordained minister, I officiated countless marriage ceremonies for parishioners, friends and family members. I believe that there is something intrinsically honorable and good about marriage. Two human beings making a lifelong commitment to love and care for one another, through good times and bad, in front of friends, family and community—it’s something special. For me, no other event can replace marriage on that level. Marriage says “we are family” in a way no other word does.


Family is something we know a lot about here in New Mexico. It’s important to us; it’s part of who we are. So let us not forget that every gay or lesbian person is a member of someone’s family—a son or a daughter, a brother or sister, a cousin, aunt or uncle. No member of anyone’s family, gay or straight, should have to face discrimination because of who they are or who they love.


Sadly, because discrimination still exists, I cannot marry the person I love. My partner and I have shared many wonderful years together and, like other gay and lesbian couples, we are already doing the hard work of marriage in our daily lives. We share hopes and dreams, care for our families, worry about making ends meet or the possibility of losing a job, plan for retirement and growing old together—all without the recognition, respect and protection that marriage provides.


My partner and I are already committed to one another in our hearts, but like I said, marriage is special. We want to get married and make that public, lifelong commitment here in New Mexico, our home.


It really just comes down to the Golden Rule: treat others as you would like to be treated. Most straight people wouldn’t like anyone telling them they couldn’t marry the person they love, and when they think about it, many say they wouldn’t want to deny it for anyone else. It is time to stop turning our backs on our gay and lesbian family and friends, and invite them to become full partners in the joys of marriage.


Rev. Dr. Lee Albertson

Retired United Church of Christ minister,

Albuquerque, NM

Tagged with: , , , ,
Posted in Featured Articles, Freedom Forum
One comment on “Marriage Is About Love, Commitment and Family—Not Discrimination
  1. Paul Fabley says:

    Unfortunately, this man has been villified by gay activists who twist his words to confuse his meaning. If you interpret his words vis-a-vis gay activism, you will arrive at the conclusion you have and your sentiments are correct. However, if you go to the source and read his words with your own interpretation, you might understand that Mainwaring is not anti-gay. Ultimately, he is not anti-gay marriage. He IS anti-big government and, like you, pro-family.

    His point is that while redefining marriage will assist gays in the short term, in the long term it is yet another of so many stepping stones building an America where individuals have no personal identity–we are increasingly becoming subjects of the state. We unwittingly follow the siren song of “freedom,” surrendering liberty after liberty along the way.

    Roe v. Wade rightly upheld a woman’s right to deal with the victimization of rape as she should. Ultimately, however, we ushered in a culture of death. Abortion is now a means of birth control. Childbearing is considered an entitlement and if a child is deemed undesirable or inconvenient via amnio, “it” is discarded. What about the grace of living a life devoted to a beautiful person who is challenged?

    This is a tough time for America. We’ve had tough times before and we will have tough times in the future. It’s important that we think carefully and deeply about the ramifications of the decisions we are making and keep vigil watch over our senses, filtering out the demands of special interest groups who, perhaps unwittingly, ultimately breed the indignity of the person.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

seven + = 10

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>